Change Instance

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "unit": "https://weblate.foundryvtt-hub.com/api/units/46785/?format=api",
    "component": "https://weblate.foundryvtt-hub.com/api/components/variant-encumbrance/main/?format=api",
    "translation": "https://weblate.foundryvtt-hub.com/api/translations/variant-encumbrance/main/en/?format=api",
    "user": null,
    "author": null,
    "timestamp": "2022-10-07T13:35:20.410972Z",
    "action": 59,
    "target": "I DON'T RECOMMENDED it, the only difference (only for item container) is \"Item container\" module set 0 if unequipped, the \"variant encumbrance\" get the value from the module setting by default 1 if unequipped, and now i remember the calculation not make sense for some people because there are two behaviour for the equipped and unequipped items if they are item container or standard item. Bags can be unequipped by players or GM, so that their reported weight drops to 0 in your inventory (only bags with a capacity other than 0 can be unequipped)",
    "old": "",
    "details": {
        "state": 20,
        "source": "I DON'T RECOMMENDED it, the only difference (only for item container) is \"Item container\" module set 0 if unequipped, the \"variant encumbrance\" get the value from the module setting by default 1 if unequipped, and now i remember the calculation not make sense for some people because there are two behaviour for the equipped and unequipped items if they are item container or standard item. Bags can be unequipped by players or GM, so that their reported weight drops to 0 in your inventory (only bags with a capacity other than 0 can be unequipped)",
        "old_state": -1
    },
    "id": 64564,
    "action_name": "String updated in the repository",
    "url": "https://weblate.foundryvtt-hub.com/api/changes/64564/?format=api"
}